Still JPG (632x342)





Ashley Harris JD022023

Skylar Harris JD022024


Department of Family & Children’s Services – the County of Santa Clara-

Social Services Agency
333 West Julian
San Jose, CA 95110
(408) 755-7100

Family Justice Center Courthouse – The Superior Court of California :

201 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

Department Of Juvenile Dependency Dept.69..


Law Foundation Of Silicon Valley :152 N 3rd St #3, San Jose, CA 95112

( Legal Advocates for Children & Youth ) – L.A.C.Y



Law Foundation Of Silicon Valley :152 N 3rd St #3, San Jose, CA 95112

Legal Advocates for Children & Youth (LACY)

animated Law Foundation








galaxy-quest  We, the people will continue to expose and fight Corruption In The County Of Santa Clara California !!!!




Law Foundation Of Silicon Valley :152 N 3rd St #3, San Jose, CA 95112

( Legal Advocates for Children & Youth ) – L.A.C.Y-


Rachel Newbury Fightmaster – Rachel Newbury Fightmaster

  SBN# 260509.

County Counsel – County of Santa Clara

70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, San Jose, CA 95110


Department of Family & Children’s Services – the County of Santa Clara-

Social Services Agency
333 West Julian
San Jose, CA 95110
(408) 755-7100

Santa Clara County Department of Family and Children’s Services- Adoptive and Foster Parent Association (KAFPA) of Santa Clara County 

Highlights info row image
(408) 501-6365


FRAUD!! – Juvenile Welfare Office of the Ombudsman (DFCS)
(408) 993-4114






Santa Clara County , California…. is  CORRUPT!!!

Still JPG (450x346)

SANTA CLARA COUNTY CALIFORNIA : #CPS FRAUD –  CHILD TRAFFICKING IS “Lu·cra·tive” : producing a great deal of profit: “Stealing CHILDREN “-Title IV-D funds that made foster care extremely profitable, Abuse by CPS, abuse by  SANTA CLARA  County , CALIFORNIA . #DFCS, – Corruption in cps, greed by cps, stealing of our children, Title IV-E …CPS is literally stealing our children and holding them ransom ….

Child Kidnapping and Trafficking: A Lucrative U.S. Business Funded

Title IV-E Funding | How Child Protection Services Buys and Sells Our

Still JPG (634x294)

Child Protective Services has a financial incentive to take children into custody and adopt them out rather than return them. Why? They get money from the Federal government for every child in custody, and they get money if the child is adopted.


On Child Protective Services, Part 4: Follow the Money – Political Outcast


When CPS Kidnaps Children for Money – The New American

Every time CPS seizes a child, it gets money from the federal government. Lots of money.


The Corrupt Business of Child Protective Services – Parental Rights

As long as the child is not returned, there is money for the agency,


How Much Money Does CPS Make Off Of Our Children? – VL

#CPS ,This is a governmental agency,  basically answers to no one.







Welcome to” Exposing Corruption In Santa Clara County, California. This blog is under construction , The full story and evidence will be uploaded to be shared with the public to view .


First ( Amendment  I) to the United States Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Freedom of the press or freedom of the media is the freedom of communication and expression through various mediums, such as electronic media and published materials.

Right to express one’s ideas and opinions freely through speech, writing, and other forms of communication .  Freedom of press is part of freedom of expression.

What is freedom of speech and expression?

Freedom of speech is the right to articulate one’s opinions and ideas without fear of government retaliation or censorship, or societal sanction. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.

freedom of the press definition. The right to circulate opinions in print without censorship by the government. Americans enjoy freedom of the press under the First Amendment to the Constitution.

How important is the freedom of the press?

It represents that, ‘Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.’ These freedoms, included within the First Amendment, are applied to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment.

That’s why Thomas Jefferson said a free press wasn’t enough to guarantee a healthy democracy. As he wrote to Charles Yancey, a prominent Virginia legislator, in 1816, “Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe.”




Please share links , Thank You!

(or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;): including and not limited to:





google plus – Corruption in Santa Clara County California Exposed


Girl exposes CPS corruption in Santa Clara County California. ( 20,401 views) – Thanks for your views!    PLEASE LIKE , SHARE AND COMMENT.


Girl Exposes CPS PART 1







Anthony Nkwo-Okere | mountainviewplannedparenthood



Anthony NkwoOkere, Social Worker III, E76C Department of Family & Children’s Services 373 W. Julian Street San Jose, California 95110-2335 Phone (408) 

mountainviewplannedparenthood | Santa Clara County CPS drugging .

Planned Parenthood – Mountain View Health Center

225 San Antonio Rd Mountain View, CA 94040 – PHONE :(650) 948-0807


Girl Exposes CPS PART 2






Girl Exposes CPS PART 3





Santa Clara County Corruption EXPOSED 1




Santa Clara County Corruption EXPOSED 2


More YouTube updates will be posted!

Santa Clara County Corruption EXPOSED part 3 , coming soon!


facebook_toogoLike Us and share on Facebook:               Corruption In Santa Clara County Exposed

Still JPG (780x304)




forward to 1:08>>>>>>link: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/thecapt/2015/04/24/the-captains-very-special-guest-attorney-robert-r-powell-on-cps-corruption


More radio interviews…Updates will be posted!


The Press…….

What , happened to journalism ???????

It used to be for the People and  the writers for the press and the media news ,

wrote stories  to help expose corruption , tell the public the truth and get justice!


next on the list:

Really?  We will call them on this one !!!

Let’s wait and see if NBC  will investigate.







The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States :

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or  

immunity  of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Santa Clara Attacks Media And Local Reports to Cover Court Misconduct.

Read: Jul 9, 2016 — More media feedback ! Santa Clara County is concealing fraud and misconduct to protect their jobs ! !

Click link: http://www.janeandjohnqpublic.com/blog/media-under-attack-by-santa-clara-county-courts



we will be heard

mighty justice




TRIAL DATE : SEPT. 11TH , 2017


justice is coming

911 corrupt officer


Still JPG (476x472)

Panel 1


Sallie Danenberg , Program Director / officer of the court , falsified documents &  False arrests, falsified allegations & continues to works for ….Santa Clara County CA!!!sallie whore

How did this dishonest ex-prostitute get appointed to work in Santa Clara County Ca as a Program Director / officer of the court , who has falsified documents. & False arrest . This woman has ..NO Values, Morals and Ethics! She has no Self respect, she has no respect for others (Talks down to her clients and uses vulgar language towards them ) …and has absolutely NO respect for the Law!!! ..She is a complete fraud!!. it was the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors district 6 and SANTA CLARA COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COUNCIL / committee -DVC whom , >>> appointed to this ex- prostitute to work for the County of Santa Clara, California !!!! YET , this ex-prostitute has NO Oversight , no supervision !!!!!! and no accountability!!!

She has committed perjury !!

She is in contempt of the court, she willfully disobeyed a court order, and ignored an enforced order!!!

Sallie Danenberg , falsifies documents and makes False allegations!


#Sallie Danenberg, A balanced approach to Counseling ,25 N 14th St
Ste 620, San Jose, CA 95112  
#Sallie Danenberg, Santa Clara County California  #Sallie Danenberg , Roswell New Mexico

Sallie whorehouse


sallie evil memoirs

Sallie Danenberg Belongs in prison!!

We will not stop until justice is delivered, remove her from her position  and put this corrupt woman behind bars!!! Sallie Danenberg is a criminal!!!!







Exposing Corruption In Santa Clara County .

Civil Rights Violation,  ( deprivation of rights, Due Process)

42 U.S. Code § 1983 – Civil action for deprivation of rights

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges……

Exposing Corruption In Santa Clara County CA:

Sallie Danenberg – Appointed by Board of Supervisors Of Santa Clara County CA

Sallie Danenberg Has committed  , Listed as follows ( and she still is free and working for the County Of Santa Clara, CA).

Penal Code, Section 236-237 – California

False imprisonment is the unlawful violation of the personal liberty of another. …. of subdivision (f) of Section 214.11 of Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

236.  False imprisonment is the unlawful violation of the
personal liberty of another. Although this may seem like 
a harmless act, it is prohibited under California law. 
California Penal Code 236 states, “false imprisonment
is the unlawful violation of the personal liberty of 

Sentencing and Punishment for PC 236 Violation: False imprisonment is a misdemeanor crime in California. If you (Sallie Danenberg ) is  convicted of this crime, you face up to 364 days in county jail, a $1,000 fine or both jail and fine.If the court finds that your act of false imprisonment occurred with menace, fraud or deceit, you could be charged with a felony. Felony false imprisonment is punishable by 16 months, two or three years in state prison. (this is what is most likely , that should occur ….). False imprisonment is a “general intent,” crime.

Can I be sued for false imprisonment?

Yes.  If you are sued civilly, you are subject to monetary damages for violating another’s personal liberty.    However, officers do have a right to a “reasonable detention,” if they are trying to investigate whether or not a crime has occurred.

In addition, you can be charged with felony false imprisonment , by use of deceit or fraud.


118.1.  Every peace officer who files any report with the agency
which employs him or her regarding the commission of any crime or any
investigation of any crime, if he or she knowingly and intentionally
makes any statement regarding any material matter in the report
which the officer knows to be false, whether or not the statement is
certified or otherwise expressly reported as true, is guilty of
filing a false report punishable by imprisonment in the county jail
for up to one year, or in the state prison for one, two, or three
years. This section shall not apply to the contents of any statement
which the peace officer attributes in the report to any other person.
118a.  Any person who, in any affidavit taken before any person
authorized to administer oaths, swears, affirms, declares, deposes,
or certifies that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify before
any competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case then pending
or thereafter to be instituted, in any particular manner, or to any
particular fact, and in such affidavit willfully and contrary to such
oath states as true any material matter which he knows to be false,
is guilty of perjury. In any prosecution under this section, the
subsequent testimony of such person, in any action involving the
matters in such affidavit contained, which is contrary to any of the
matters in such affidavit contained, shall be prima facie evidence
that the matters in such affidavit were false.

124.  The making of a deposition, affidavit or certificate is deemed
to be complete, within the provisions of this chapter, from the time
when it is delivered by the accused to any other person, with the
intent that it be uttered or published as true.

126.  Perjury is punishable by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision
(h) of Section 1170 for two, three or four years.

127.  Every person who willfully procures another person to commit
perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and is punishable in the
same manner as he would be if personally guilty of the perjury so

129.  Every person who, being required by law to make any return,
statement, or report, under oath, willfully makes and delivers any
such return, statement, or report, purporting to be under oath,
knowing the same to be false in any particular, is guilty of perjury,
whether such oath was in fact taken or not.

U.S. CodeTitle 18Part IChapter 79 › § 1621

18 U.S. Code § 1621 – Perjury generally

(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;

is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.
In most cases, the courts abbreviate their description of the elements and state that to prove perjury in a judicial context under Section 1623 the government must establish that the defendant:
“(1) knowingly made a (2) false (3) material declaration (4) under oath (5) in a proceeding before or ancillary to  (any court ) or grand jury of the United States.”
Section 1622 outlaws procuring or inducing another to commit perjury: “Whoever procures
another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both,” 18 U.S.C. 1622.
Moreover, regardless of the offense for which an individual is convicted, the federal sentencing guidelines may call for his sentence to be enhanced as a consequence of any obstruction of justice in the form of perjury or false statements for which he is responsible, if committed during the course of the investigation, prosecution, or
sentencing for the offense of his conviction. The enhancement may result in an increase in his term of imprisonment by as much as four years. “knowing” mens rea standard
rather than the more demanding “willfully” standard used in Section 1621.
12 Parsed into elements, Section 1623 declares that”
I. Whoever
II. a. under oath or
b. in any
i. declaration,
ii. certificate,
iii. verification, or
iv. statement

under penalty of perjury as permitted under [Section ]1746 of title 28, United States


III. in any proceeding before or ancillary to
a. any court or
b. grand jury of the United States
IV. knowingly
V. a. makes any false material declaration or
b. makes or uses any other information, including any
i. book,
ii. paper,
iii. document,
iv. record,
v. recording, or
vi. other material,
knowing the same to contain any false material declaration,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
 Sallie Danenberg is in Contempt of court  Of California:
Penalties. For the most part, contempt of court (including violations of court orders) is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in county jail and a maximum $1,000 fine.
Penal Code 166 PC punishes contempt of court. “Contempt of court” essentially refers to any behavior that is disrespectful to the court process. Examples include (but are not limited to):

willfully disobeying a court order.1, This is the  example that tends to trigger the greatest penalties and the type of contempt upon which this article will focus.


For the most part, contempt of court (including violations of court orders) is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in county jail and a maximum $1,000 fine. That said, there are situations that invite more serious penalties such as higher fines and up to one year in jail and/or a potential state prison sentence.

1. What is Penal Code 166 “Contempt of Court”?

1.1. Lawful order

1.2. Knowledge about the order

1.3. Ability to comply with the order

1.4. Willful failure to comply with the order


willfully disobeying a lawfully issued court order.

In order to convict you of contempt of court for violating a court order, the prosecutor must prove the following facts (otherwise known as “elements” of the crime):

  1. The judge issued a legal order, (1st order Dec.2012) & Enforcement order July 2014
  2. you knew about the order,
  3. you had the ability to comply with the order, yet
  4. you willfully failed to do so.





Million Parents March to D.C16299045_1341884109201718_221450540607446566_n.jpg

White House, Washington D.C.

Washington, District of Columbia 20500
Monday, September 18 at 8 AM4 PM EDT
Panel 2


This is a contact page:

Corruption in Santa Clara County,California Exposed

Please like Us on Facebook and share, Thanks!


Link : https://www.facebook.com/courruptioninsantaclaracounty/?fref=ts


Exposing Corruption: Santa Clara County California!

The List  of  Corrupted Employees of Santa Clara County ,CA :

Superior Court Of California, County Of Santa Clara, Family Justice Center Courthouse : Address : 201 N 1st St, San Jose, CA 95113


Dependency Advocacy Center: Address: 111 W St John St # 333, San Jose, CA 95113 Phone: (408) 995-0714 ,  John B. Neiman , Bar Number: 184195. – Supervisor

County Counsel OF Santa Clara County :Address: 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, San Jose, CA 95110.  Phone: (408) 299-5900

Attorney : Arlene Rozul, State Bar ID: 135912


County Of Santa Clara (CPS)
Social Services Agency
333 West Julian
San Jose, CA 95110
(408) 755-7100

Legal Advocates for Children & Youth (LACY) & Law Foundation of Silicon Valley.

Case Name :  A.Harris case #              and S.Harris  case#

Address: Law Foundation of Silicon Valley 152 N 3rd St Fl 3. San Jose, CA 95112

Phone: (408) 280-2461

Andrew Mitchell Cain-Supervising Attorney- Bar Number:#218267


Rachel Newbury Fightmaster – Attorney – Bar Number: 260509



(Reports submitted  with no factual basis & no substantial evidence to any of allegations. )

Issues :

Over drugging of children – not in the best interest of the children.

andrewc@lawfoundation.org rachel.fightmaster@lawfoundation.org

Santa Clara County Domestic Violence Council:

The Domestic Violence Council’s (DVC)


 The DVC consists of 22 members who are appointed be the Board of Supervisors.

Board of Supervisors – County of Santa Clara

Address : 70 West Hedding, 10th Floor San Jose, CA 95110
Phone : 408.299.5040
Fax : 408.299.2038

(Sallie Ann Danenberg ) A Program Director  in Santa Clara County  CA ,  was Appointed by DVC Council’s and The Board Of Supervisors Of Santa Clara County, California.

Sallie Danenberg – DBA   (A balanced approach to counseling) aka New Beginnings .-Owner, New Beginnings Counseling & Consulting.

(  LMFT and LCSW )

New location address : 25 N 14th St. Suite 620. San Jose, CA 95125.


NPI Number : 1144775909
Entity Type Code : Organization
Provider Name (Legal Business Name) : A BALANCED APPROACH TO COUNSELING
 License Number  MFC25414  CA
Provider Business Mailing Address
First Line : 25 N 14TH ST
Second Line : SUITE 620
State : CA
Zip : 95112-6204
Country : US
Telephone Number : 408-298-8703
Fax Number : 408-298-8713