Welcome to Exposing Corruption In Santa Clara County. This blog is under construction , The full story and evidence will be uploaded to be shared with the public to view .


First ( Amendment  I) to the United States Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.



Please share links , Thank You!

(or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;): including and not limited to:




Girl exposes CPS corruption in Santa Clara County California.


Santa Clara County Corruption EXPOSED 1


Santa Clara County Corruption EXPOSED 2



forward to 1:08>>>>>>link: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/thecapt/2015/04/24/the-captains-very-special-guest-attorney-robert-r-powell-on-cps-corruption

More  radio interviews  to be posted………


The Press…….

What , happened to journalism ???????

It used to be for the People and  the writers for the press and the media news ,

wrote stories  to help expose corruption and get justice!


next on the list:

Really?  We will call them on this one !!!

Let’s wait and see if NBC  will investigate.







The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States :

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or  

immunity  of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Santa Clara Attacks Media And Local Reports to Cover Court Misconduct.

Read: Jul 9, 2016 — More media feedback ! Santa Clara County is concealing fraud and misconduct to protect their jobs ! !

Click link: http://www.janeandjohnqpublic.com/blog/media-under-attack-by-santa-clara-county-courts


Panel 1


Sallie Danenberg Belongs in prison!!

We will not stop until justice is delivered, remove her from her position  and put this corrupt woman behind bars!!! Sallie Danenberg is a criminal!!!!







Exposing Corruption In Santa Clara County .

Civil Rights Violation,  ( deprivation of rights, Due Process)

42 U.S. Code § 1983 – Civil action for deprivation of rights

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges……

Exposing Corruption In Santa Clara County CA:

Sallie Danenberg – Appointed by Board of Supervisors Of Santa Clara County CA

Sallie Danenberg Has committed  , Listed as follows ( and she still is free and working for the County Of Santa Clara, CA).

Penal Code, Section 236-237 – California

False imprisonment is the unlawful violation of the personal liberty of another. …. of subdivision (f) of Section 214.11 of Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

236.  False imprisonment is the unlawful violation of the
personal liberty of another. Although this may seem like 
a harmless act, it is prohibited under California law. 
California Penal Code 236 states, “false imprisonment
is the unlawful violation of the personal liberty of 

Sentencing and Punishment for PC 236 Violation: False imprisonment is a misdemeanor crime in California. If you (Sallie Danenberg ) is  convicted of this crime, you face up to 364 days in county jail, a $1,000 fine or both jail and fine.If the court finds that your act of false imprisonment occurred with menace, fraud or deceit, you could be charged with a felony. Felony false imprisonment is punishable by 16 months, two or three years in state prison. (this is what is most likely , that should occur ….). False imprisonment is a “general intent,” crime.

Can I be sued for false imprisonment?

Yes.  If you are sued civilly, you are subject to monetary damages for violating another’s personal liberty.    However, officers do have a right to a “reasonable detention,” if they are trying to investigate whether or not a crime has occurred.

In addition, you can be charged with felony false imprisonment , by use of deceit or fraud.


118.1.  Every peace officer who files any report with the agency
which employs him or her regarding the commission of any crime or any
investigation of any crime, if he or she knowingly and intentionally
makes any statement regarding any material matter in the report
which the officer knows to be false, whether or not the statement is
certified or otherwise expressly reported as true, is guilty of
filing a false report punishable by imprisonment in the county jail
for up to one year, or in the state prison for one, two, or three
years. This section shall not apply to the contents of any statement
which the peace officer attributes in the report to any other person.
118a.  Any person who, in any affidavit taken before any person
authorized to administer oaths, swears, affirms, declares, deposes,
or certifies that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify before
any competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case then pending
or thereafter to be instituted, in any particular manner, or to any
particular fact, and in such affidavit willfully and contrary to such
oath states as true any material matter which he knows to be false,
is guilty of perjury. In any prosecution under this section, the
subsequent testimony of such person, in any action involving the
matters in such affidavit contained, which is contrary to any of the
matters in such affidavit contained, shall be prima facie evidence
that the matters in such affidavit were false.

124.  The making of a deposition, affidavit or certificate is deemed
to be complete, within the provisions of this chapter, from the time
when it is delivered by the accused to any other person, with the
intent that it be uttered or published as true.

126.  Perjury is punishable by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision
(h) of Section 1170 for two, three or four years.

127.  Every person who willfully procures another person to commit
perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and is punishable in the
same manner as he would be if personally guilty of the perjury so

129.  Every person who, being required by law to make any return,
statement, or report, under oath, willfully makes and delivers any
such return, statement, or report, purporting to be under oath,
knowing the same to be false in any particular, is guilty of perjury,
whether such oath was in fact taken or not.

U.S. CodeTitle 18Part IChapter 79 › § 1621

18 U.S. Code § 1621 – Perjury generally

(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;

is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.
In most cases, the courts abbreviate their description of the elements and state that to prove perjury in a judicial context under Section 1623 the government must establish that the defendant:
“(1) knowingly made a (2) false (3) material declaration (4) under oath (5) in a proceeding before or ancillary to  (any court ) or grand jury of the United States.”
Section 1622 outlaws procuring or inducing another to commit perjury: “Whoever procures
another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both,” 18 U.S.C. 1622.
Moreover, regardless of the offense for which an individual is convicted, the federal sentencing guidelines may call for his sentence to be enhanced as a consequence of any obstruction of justice in the form of perjury or false statements for which he is responsible, if committed during the course of the investigation, prosecution, or
sentencing for the offense of his conviction. The enhancement may result in an increase in his term of imprisonment by as much as four years. “knowing” mens rea standard
rather than the more demanding “willfully” standard used in Section 1621.
12 Parsed into elements, Section 1623 declares that”
I. Whoever
II. a. under oath or
b. in any
i. declaration,
ii. certificate,
iii. verification, or
iv. statement

under penalty of perjury as permitted under [Section ]1746 of title 28, United States


III. in any proceeding before or ancillary to
a. any court or
b. grand jury of the United States
IV. knowingly
V. a. makes any false material declaration or
b. makes or uses any other information, including any
i. book,
ii. paper,
iii. document,
iv. record,
v. recording, or
vi. other material,
knowing the same to contain any false material declaration,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
 Sallie Danenberg is in Contempt of court  Of California:
Penalties. For the most part, contempt of court (including violations of court orders) is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in county jail and a maximum $1,000 fine.
Penal Code 166 PC punishes contempt of court. “Contempt of court” essentially refers to any behavior that is disrespectful to the court process. Examples include (but are not limited to):

willfully disobeying a court order.1, This is the  example that tends to trigger the greatest penalties and the type of contempt upon which this article will focus.


For the most part, contempt of court (including violations of court orders) is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in county jail and a maximum $1,000 fine. That said, there are situations that invite more serious penalties such as higher fines and up to one year in jail and/or a potential state prison sentence.

1. What is Penal Code 166 “Contempt of Court”?

1.1. Lawful order

1.2. Knowledge about the order

1.3. Ability to comply with the order

1.4. Willful failure to comply with the order


willfully disobeying a lawfully issued court order.

In order to convict you of contempt of court for violating a court order, the prosecutor must prove the following facts (otherwise known as “elements” of the crime):

  1. The judge issued a legal order, (1st order Dec.2012) & Enforcement order July 2014
  2. you knew about the order,
  3. you had the ability to comply with the order, yet
  4. you willfully failed to do so.





Million Parents March to D.C16299045_1341884109201718_221450540607446566_n.jpg

White House, Washington D.C.

Washington, District of Columbia 20500
Monday, September 18 at 8 AM4 PM EDT
Panel 2


This is a contact page:

Corruption in Santa Clara County,California Exposed

Please like Us on Facebook and share, Thanks!


Link : https://www.facebook.com/courruptioninsantaclaracounty/?fref=ts


Exposing Corruption: Santa Clara County California!

The List  of  Corrupted Employees of Santa Clara County ,CA :

Superior Court Of California, County Of Santa Clara, Family Justice Center Courthouse : Address : 201 N 1st St, San Jose, CA 95113


Dependency Advocacy Center: Address: 111 W St John St # 333, San Jose, CA 95113 Phone: (408) 995-0714 ,  John B. Neiman , Bar Number: 184195. – Supervisor

County Counsel OF Santa Clara County :Address: 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, San Jose, CA 95110.  Phone: (408) 299-5900

Attorney : Arlene Rozul, State Bar ID: 135912


County Of Santa Clara (CPS)
Social Services Agency
333 West Julian
San Jose, CA 95110
(408) 755-7100

Legal Advocates for Children & Youth (LACY) & Law Foundation of Silicon Valley.

Case Name :  A.Harris case #              and S.Harris  case#

Address: Law Foundation of Silicon Valley 152 N 3rd St Fl 3. San Jose, CA 95112

Phone: (408) 280-2461

Andrew Mitchell Cain-Supervising Attorney- Bar Number:#218267


Rachel Newbury Fightmaster – Attorney – Bar Number: 260509



(Reports submitted  with no factual basis & no substantial evidence to any of allegations. )

Issues :

Over drugging of children – not in the best interest of the children.

andrewc@lawfoundation.org rachel.fightmaster@lawfoundation.org

Santa Clara County Domestic Violence Council:

The Domestic Violence Council’s (DVC)


 The DVC consists of 22 members who are appointed be the Board of Supervisors.

Board of Supervisors – County of Santa Clara

Address : 70 West Hedding, 10th Floor San Jose, CA 95110
Phone : 408.299.5040
Fax : 408.299.2038

(Sallie Ann Danenberg ) A Program Director  in Santa Clara County  CA ,  was Appointed by DVC Council’s and The Board Of Supervisors Of Santa Clara County, California.

Sallie Danenberg – DBA   (A balanced approach to counseling) aka New Beginnings .-Owner, New Beginnings Counseling & Consulting.

(  LMFT and LCSW )

New location address : 25 N 14th St. Suite 620. San Jose, CA 95125.


NPI Number : 1144775909
Entity Type Code : Organization
Provider Name (Legal Business Name) : A BALANCED APPROACH TO COUNSELING
 License Number  MFC25414  CA
Provider Business Mailing Address
First Line : 25 N 14TH ST
Second Line : SUITE 620
State : CA
Zip : 95112-6204
Country : US
Telephone Number : 408-298-8703
Fax Number : 408-298-8713